Contact Us

|

Careers

|

Change Locale
close

CYOD: A New Way to Embrace Mobile Devices

From the experts | Posted on September 5, 2013 by Angela Cope

The proliferation of personal mobile devices is changing the way we do business — and companies are either embracing it, or sticking with the status quo. But there is another option that’s gaining momentum.

On one end of the spectrum is COPE (company-issued, personally-enabled), where the organization chooses which devices employees use, and the company owns and pays for the device.

On the other end of the spectrum is BYOD (bring-your-own-device), where employees are allowed to use their personal mobile device for work, but they pay for it and typically support it themselves.

The company benefits from BYO by not having to purchase the devices. But, because IT no longer has control over which devices are being used on the network, corporate security measures are difficult to enforce. There are also issues around data ownership, data integrity and the management of alien devices in the corporate environment.

A third option strikes the balance between COPE and BYOD, and it’s gaining in popularity.

It’s called CYOD (choose-your-own-device). CYOD offers an alternative to companies that want to provide choice to employees while still maintaining some control over their IT environment.

With CYOD, employees are offered a choice of devices that meet the company’s standards for security, reliability and durability. IT is able to manage the deployment of multiple devices with the right configurations and keep the IT environment secure.

What makes CYO different from COPE is that the company can either pay for the devices or provide employees with a stipend to buy their own device from a list of approved options. And, depending on the needs of the company, employees can either keep the device or return it when they leave the company. Ultimately, it offers more flexibility than COPE.

For companies looking to balance the demands of IT with the needs of employees, CYO offers an attractive middle ground between COPE and BYO. We’ve looked at a variety of common factors organizations need  to think about when outlining a device model, and have determined the following differentiators between COPE, CYO and CYO.

COPE,CYO,BYO Matrix
Employees aren’t shoehorned into using one device — they feel they have input into the process and, unlike BYO, they can continue to receive some support from the IT department. The company is still responsible for security, standards, device replacement and device compatibility. Administration, maintenance and management responsibilities can be shared between the company and the employees.

Still unsure? We’re going through this so you don’t have to

We’re walking the talk by rolling out a CYO pilot program across our organization. We’re looking to see how much flexibility CYO provides in terms of control, governance, mitigating risk and managing resources — all while giving employees a seat at the table when it comes to the technology they use at work.

Over the next couple of months, we’ll see how well our theories work in practice. We believe CYO will improve job satisfaction, and perhaps even change the way we work with partners and clients. We’ll also find out how the results compare and contrast with our current BYO program.

Our best resource for feedback is our own employees — so we selected some of the most vocal and opinionated people in our organization to share their experiences with the CYO pilot. This will help us to identify best practices and things to avoid in order to help you, the customer, make more informed strategic business decisions.

Additional Resources

If you have any questions about CYO, feel free to comment below. You can also discover what our CYO participants are talking about on Twitter by following the hashtag #SCYO

Consulting – The Secret Ingredient to CYOD Success

Putting CYOD To the Ultimate Test – 8,000 Miles Away

4 Steps to Choosing the Right Devices for CYOD

How Choosing My Own Device Changed the Way I Work (and Play)

Why CYOD Didn’t Work for Me (And What You Should Do Differently)

Related Posts

5 Communication Tool Rollout Tips For Happier Employees Employees today have more ways to communicate and collaborate than ever before, from desk phones and email to productivity apps in the cloud, instant messaging, video conf...
Services Spotlight: Healthcare Industry Podcast This is an exciting time in the world of communication technologies. It holds the promise of great opportunity as well as some daunting challenges around implementing, manag...
2 Principles Of Data Backup That Save $12,500 Per Hour According to a recent survey of over 2,000 SMBs, the average cost per hour of a data center outage is $12,500 for a SMB organization, and up to $60,000 per hour for a mid-...

Related Articles

Culture | August 6, 2020 by Softchoice

This July, we celebrated our third annual Social Impact Month.   At Softchoice, July serves as a rallying point for every person in the company to generate meaningful impact. With the unprecedented events of this year, it was more important than ever that we looked to better support the communities in which we live and work while building a more giving and compassionate culture.   Although our […]

Culture | July 27, 2020 by Softchoice

Toward the end of February, the reality of the COVID-19 pandemic was becoming more evident to the Softchoice leadership team. Our People and Growth leaders knew they would need an agile response to keep our people and our customers safe.    Our business continuity plans to address technology redundancy were in place.  As a result of processes that had been in place for 3 years, we were perhaps ahead of most in our ability to move to a full remote work […]

Culture | June 17, 2020 by Softchoice

In 1989, Jone Panavas founded Softchoice along with David Holgate to make it easier for businesses to source and acquire hard–to–find software products. Jone and David set out to make Softchoice a different kind of company from the very beginning, one where inclusiveness was a core tenet and employees were encouraged to bring their authentic selves to work.   While the technology landscape has become far more complex in the last 30 years, another […]